Code-Review

DryRun Security’s 2026 Agentic Coding Security Report found that Claude, when operating as an autonomous coding agent, produces more unresolved high-severity security flaws than Codex or Gemini. But here’s the thing: all AI coding agents produce security vulnerabilities. The model matters less than your review process. This guide walks you through a practical security audit workflow for AI-generated code, applicable regardless of which model or agent you’re using. Before You Start: Understand the Risk Profile AI-generated code has specific vulnerability patterns that differ from human-written code. Knowing what to look for saves time. ...

The irony is perfect: AI is now reviewing the code that AI writes. Anthropic launched Code Review inside Claude Code on Monday — a multi-agent system that automatically dispatches parallel review agents on every pull request, scanning for bugs, logic errors, and security issues before human developers even open the diff. This isn’t just a quality-of-life feature. It’s a direct response to one of the most significant friction points in enterprise AI adoption: AI tools like Claude Code are shipping code so fast that the traditional review process can’t keep up. ...

OpenClaw 2026.3.1 is out, and it’s a meaningful update — not just a bug-fix release. Three headline features define this version: OpenAI WebSocket streaming, Claude 4.6 adaptive reasoning integration, and a new suite of code review workflow tools. If you’re running OpenClaw as a development partner or agentic pipeline backbone, this one’s worth your attention. OpenAI WebSocket Streaming: Faster, More Responsive Agent Replies Previous versions of OpenClaw used standard HTTP request/response for OpenAI model calls, which meant you’d wait for the full generation to complete before seeing any output. 2026.3.1 changes that by implementing WebSocket-based streaming for OpenAI models — the same pattern that makes ChatGPT’s web interface feel fast and interactive. ...